|
Molecular and Cellular Modeling
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of binding parameters of (1S)-camphor and (1R)-camphor
Parameter | (1S)-camphor | (1R)-camphor |
Uncoupling (%) | 11 | 3 |
For oxidized protein: | - | - |
Kd (microM) | 7.4 | 2.3 |
Kspin | 1033 | 1267 |
P(1/2) (MPa) | 288 | 305 |
deltaV (cm3/mol) | -57 | -70 |
spin trans. rate (% low-spin/K) | 0.304 | 0.106 |
rmsd (Angstrom) | 0.90 | 0.55 |
For reduced protein: | - | - |
deltaH (kJ/mol) | -4.4 | 9.5 |
deltaS (J/Kmol) | 60.2 | 131.9 |
deltaG (kJ/mol) | -22.3 | -29.9 |
rmsd (Angstrom) | 0.97 | 0.58 |
Table 1.
-Kd was measured at 277 K in 60% glycerol.
-Kspin was measured at 297 K.
-P(1/2) and deltaV are measured by application of hydrostatic pressure.
-The spin transition rate is given for fast cooling from 298 to 78 K.
-The rmsd is the root mean standard deviation of the camphor non-hydrogen
atoms from their mean positions during molecular dynamics simulations of
the camphor-cytochrome P450cam complexes at 300 K.
-See [10] for details of the above.
-deltaH, deltaS and deltaG are derived from measurements of the kon and
koff by FTIR of the CO stretch band at 297 K in 60% glycerol.[1]
All these measurements point to the less optimal binding and greater
mobility of (1S)-camphor in the cytochrome P450cam binding site compared
to (1R)-camphor.
Click here to go
back!
Wade et al. (1996) Fundamentals of Enzyme-Ligand Interactions in
Cytochrome P450cam
POPE5 Conference Proceedings HTML document: 10 out of 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
webmaster |