pymol - dock_sol1_sol3_dielc.pse
1gj7_lig_doc
1gj7_lig_doc.sdf 10 best docking solutions ranked by
GOLD
model1
model1.pdb
receptor model1
dock_sol1
1gj7_lig_doc_sol1.sdf docking solution 1 (flipped)
dock_sol3
1gj7_lig_doc_sol3.sdf docking solution 3 (best
solution)
sol3_dielc1
model1.sol3_dielc1.min.pdb
sol3_dielc4
model1.sol3_dielc4.min.pdb
sol3_dielc80
model1.sol3_dielc80.min.pdb
sol3_dielc80
model1.sol1_dielc80.min.pdb
sol3_dielc4
model1.sol1_dielc4.min.pdb
sol3_dielc1
model1.sol1_dielc1.min.pdb
1gj7.prot.ligand xray-structure of ligand 1gj7
1gj7.align
xray structure of receptor 1gj7
1gj7.xray_dielc4.min minimized xray structure of
complex 1gj7-A, dielc=4.0, with crystallographic water
1gj7.xray_dielc1.min minimized xray structure of
complex 1gj7-A, dielc=1.0, with crystallographic water
1gj7.xray_dielc80.min minimized xray structure of
complex 1gj7-A, dielc=80.0, with crystallographic water
Choosing dielc=4 improves the minimization of the docked ligand very
much. dielc=80 gives no better results. All
minimized docking solutions are showing distortions of the ring system
next to the amidino group. This ring distortion
can not be found in the minimized xray structure with explicit
crystallographic water molecules.
The sander output shows completly different energy values, eg. sol1:
dielc=1 energy=-1.2495E+03
dielc=4 energy=9.5266E+02
dielc=80 energy=1.5518E+03
Less than 400 minimization cycles seem to be enough for minimization of
docked ligands.
13.07.05
b70-100_2.4.pdb water sites from cluster analysis
with occ 70 %
two-step minimization of docking solution 3 with hydrogens 70-100 %:
1. 200 cycles 2. 500 cycles xleap.sh -gold -sdf
1gj7_lig_doc_sol3.sdf -n A18 -prot model1.pdb -pdb model1 -alt
sol3_dielc4_H_wat70 -min docking.restrain.in -notemp -w wat
b70-100_2.4.pdb
1. all hydrogens (minH.restrain.in) -
./model1.sol3_dielc4_H_wat70.minH.pdb
2. all atoms (docking.restrain.in) -
./model1.sol3_dielc4_H_wat70.min.pdb
In sol3 there are no much differences
between minimization in one step (w/o hydrogen minimization separately) and two step
(1. hydrogens, 2. all) minimization. In sol1 (flipped) the differences are
much stronger.